State vs. Keith Smith
|
Giles | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
William Jones vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. John Stone
|
Bedford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Gary W. Phelps vs. David Mills
|
Hickman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Talley
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. George Washington
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Walter Wilson
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. David Cliff
|
Dyer | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Ronnie Graham
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. William Bucy
|
Henry | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Perez
|
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Rathal Perkins
|
Haywood | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9601-CC-00029
|
Bledsoe | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9710-CC-00505
|
Houston | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
James Majors vs. State
|
Sumner | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Jeremy Amis
|
Humphreys | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Ricky Melvin vs State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Mark Higgins vs State
|
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Darryl Bailey
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Cannon vs. State
|
Bledsoe | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Martin R. Craddock vs. State of Tennessee
The petitioner, Martin R. Craddock, appeals as of right from the Davidson County Criminal Court’s denial of habeas corpus relief. He is presently in the custody of the Department of Correction serving a Range I sentence of ten years for his conviction of aggravated sexual battery in 1995. He contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and that the judgment entered against him is void because the indictment for aggravated sexual battery fails to allege the mens rea for the offense. We affirm the dismissal of the petition. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Michael Brent Cook
The Defendant, Michael Brent Cook, appeals as of right from the revocation of his probation by the Sumner County Criminal Court. He contends that the trial court abused its discretion in revoking his proba tion. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Sumner | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Michael T. Keen
Michael T. Keen, the Defendant, appeals as of right following his sentencing hearing in the Sum ner County Criminal Court. Defendant was indicted for vehicular homicide and DUI, second offense. In an agreement with the State, Defendant pled guilty to vehicular homicide, a Class B felony, and agreed to an eight (8) year sentence, with the trial court to determine the manner of service of the sente nce. Following his sentencing hearing, the trial court orde red Defendant to serve eight (8) years in the Tennessee Department of Correction. In his appeal, Defendant argues that the trial court erred in refusing to grant an alterna tive sentence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Sumner | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Sheryl Pendergrass
The defendant, Sheryl L. Pendergrass, appeals a certified question of law pursuant to Rule 37(b)(2)(I), Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure. In the Sumner County Criminal Court, the defendant pleaded guilty to three drug offenses, subject to reservation of the certified question. In her certified question, the defendant contends that law enforcement officers infringed on her rights to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures pursuant to the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution and article 1, section 7 of the Tennessee Constitution. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Sumner | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Jimmy Jones, Jr. vs. State of Tennessee
The appellant, Jimmy Jones, Jr., appeals the dismissal of his pro se motion to reopen post-conviction petition or in the alternative a petition for habeas corpus relief by the Sumner County Criminal Court. In December, 1987, the appellant was convicted by a Sumner County jury on two counts of armed robbery and one count of burglary. The appellant received concurrent Range II sentences of forty-five years for the armed robbery convictions and fourteen years for the burglary conviction to run consecutively. On direct appeal, the appellant alleged trial errors as to (1) the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdicts, (2) whether the trial court erred in limiting production of police reports, and (3) whether his effective sentence of fifty-nine years was excessive. In January, 1989, this court affirmed the judgment of the trial court in State v. Jimmy Jones, Jr., Sumner County No. 88-58-III (Tenn. Crim. App., Nashville, January 11, 1989) per. app. denied (Tenn. 1989). |
Sumner | Court of Criminal Appeals |
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OPINIONS
Appellate court opinions will be posted only after they have been made accessible under federal ADA guidelines. If an opinion is not yet available, it is still undergoing the accessibility process. We appreciate your patience and are committed to ensuring that all users can access these documents.