Special Three-Judge Panels

Proceedings & Updates


Upcoming Hearings

Stephen J. Mulroy v. Jonathan Skrmetti and William Lee (No. CH-26-0735-1) 

Hearing on September 10, 2026, at 1:00 PM CST/ 2:00 PM ET. 


Criteria & Procedure For Cases

The law states the following:

"(a) A civil action in which the complaint meets each of the following criteria must be heard and determined by a three-judge panel pursuant to this chapter:

(1) Challenges the constitutionality of:

  (A) A state statute, including a statute that apportions or redistricts state legislative or congressional districts;

   (B) An executive order; or

   (C)An administrative rule or regulation;

(2) Includes a claim for declaratory judgment or injunctive relief; and

(3) Is brought against the state, a state department or agency, or a state official acting in their official capacity."

Section 1 of Rule 54, Rule for Special Three-Judge Panels, basically adopts the language of T. C .A. Section 20-18-101(a); however, it does add that this rule applies to amended complaints, counter-claims, and third-party complaints as well as complaints.

Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 54 details the initial procedure that must be followed, including notice and service requirements. The presiding judge in the judicial district where the notice is filed makes the initial determination as to whether the case meets the criteria for a three-judge panel. Within fifteen (15) days of receiving notice, the presiding judge will notify the Supreme Court of the filing and the initial determination. The Supreme Court makes the final determination as to whether the case qualifies for a three-judge panel.

Appeals for a case heard by a three-judge panel will be heard by the Court of Appeals, except for redistricting challenges or apportionment plan, which will go directly to the Supreme Court. Special Three-Judge Panels

In May 2021, the General Assembly passed and the Governor signed an act to create special three-judge panels for cases that meet specific criteria. The law required the Tennessee Supreme Court to promulgate rules governing the practice and procedure of those panels.  In June 2021, the Tennessee Supreme Court amended the Rules of the Supreme Court of Tennessee to add new Rule 54, Interim Rule for Special Three-Judge Panels, effective July 1, 2021.

Under the law, the Supreme Court will select two trial court judges to sit with the judge to whom the case was originally assigned. There will be one judge from each of Tennessee’s three grand divisions and the Supreme Court will designate a chief judge for the case. On the panel, a majority vote rules. The venue for the case is the county where the plaintiff resides and is Sumner County if the plaintiff is not a Tennessee resident.


Key Documents

Tennessee Supreme Court Rule 54 


 

CASES BEFORE SPECIAL THREE JUDGE PANELS

Case Name Case Number County Status
Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport Authority and City of Chattanooga, Tennessee v. Bill Lee, et al. 26-0431 Hamilton
Misty Leamon v. Omni Services Inc., Summit Point Insurance Company and the State of Tennessee 2026-CV-89 McMinn Active
The Town of Tellico Plains v. the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation and the Tennessee Board of Water, Quality, Oil & Gas 22,265 Monroe Active
Alcoa, INC. with Helmsman a/k/a Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and its Third Party Administrator v. Walter H. Myers v. State of Tennessee and Arconic Corporation L-21656 Blount Active
Financial Technology Association v. David Gerregano 26-0753-III Davidson Active
Steven J. Mulroy v. Jonathan Skrmetti and Bill Lee CH-26-0735-I Shelby Active
Robert R. Wilson v. Blount Discount Pharmacy Inc., Bridgefield Casualty Insurance Company, and the State of Tennessee 2026-CH-54 Blount Active
Brian Cox v. Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC and the State of Tennessee 2026-CH-53 Blount Active
NAACP and Gloria Sweet-Love, et al. v. The State of Tennessee Governor, et al. No. 26-591-II Davidson Active
Kimberlee Gentile v. Tennessee CVS Pharmacy, LLC, and the State of Tennessee No. 210683-I Knox Active
Chazz Hill vs. State of Tennessee 25-0504-II Davidson Active
Clay Capp et. al. vs. Glenn Funk et. al., No. 25-0880-IV Davidson Active
Pachinger v. Lee No. 23-207784-3 Knox Active
Colman v. Bd. of Veterinary Medical Exam'rs MG-24-26 Montgomery Case dismissed without prejudice 5/23/2025.
Torch Electronics, LLC v. Steven J. Mulroy, Shelby County Chancery Court No. CH-24-0985 No. CH-24-0985 Shelby Appeal
IAN HUNTER LUCAS, v. TENNESSEE BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION, and STEVEN GENTILE, Executive Director of the Tennessee Higher Education Commission No. 24C1883 Davidson Active
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County v. Bill Lee, et al. 23-0778-II Davidson Closed
Islamic Center of Nashville v. State of Tennessee, et al 21-0182-IV Davidson Closed
Jeremy Babb v. Bill Lee, et al. 23-1600-I Davidson Active
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County v. Bill Lee, et al. 23-1311-III Davidson Active
Hillside Winery, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 21-0071-III Davidson Closed
Leah Gilliam v. David Gerregano, et al. 21-0606-III Davidson Heard by the Tennessee Supreme Court in Memphis on 4/3/2024. Panel held in abeyance.
Kimberly Jones-Mbuyi, et al. v. Jill Fictheard, et al. 23-1585-I Davidson Active-Appeal filed from Order Granting the State of Tennessee’s Motion to Intervene 6/21/24; panel held in abeyance.
Ralph Thomas Reach, M.D. v. Tenn. Bd. of Med. Exm’rs 25-CV-0225 Davidson Closed
Allyson Phillips, et al. v. State of Tennessee, et al. 23-1196-I Davidson Active -Dispositive Motion Hearing Scheduled 3/5/26 and Trial Scheduled to start 4/27/26.
Thomas West v. Tenn. Comm’r of Revenue 23-0776-III Davidson Closed
Tenn. Educ. Ass’n, et al. v. Bill Lee, et al. 23-0784-II Davidson Case dismissed without prejudice 8/7/2023.
Heidi Basgall, et al. v. Bill Lee, et al. 23-0866-I Davidson Case dismissed without prejudice 11/21/2023.
Metro. Gov’t of Nashville & Davidson Cnty. v. Bill Lee, et al. and Colby Slegde, et al. v. Bill Lee, et al. 23-0670-I and 23-0712-IV(I) Davidson Plaintiffs’ Motions for Summary Judgment granted 9/21/2023; no appeal filed. Case closed.
Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County v. Bill Lee, et al. and Colby Sledge, et al. v. Bill Lee, et al. 23-0670-I & 23-0172-IV(I) Davidson Closed
Smith v. Gerregano 20-0640-I Davidson Closed
Rutan-Ram, et al. v. Tenn. Dep’t of Children’s Servs., et al 22-0080-III Davidson Closed
Metro. Gov't v. Bill Lee (Airport) 23-0778-II Davidson Closed
Pamela Moses v. Mark Goins, et al. No. CT-1579-19 Shelby Active
Hughes, et al. v. Bill Lee, et al. 24475 Gibson Appeal
Metro Gov't v. Bill Lee, et al. 23-0336-I and 23-0395-III(I) Davidson Active
Shelby Cnty. Bd. of Educ., et al. v. Lee, et al. 5-1048-III Davidson Stayed per December 10, 2021 Order
Curd v. State ex rel. TBI, et al. 20-3727-2 Knox Active
Woods v. Rausch, et al. 21-0018-II Davidson Active
Little v. Lee, et al. 21-0843-II Davidson Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment granted 11/22/23; Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter or Amend denied 12/21/23; no appeal filed. Case closed.