Venture Express vs. Zilly, Ind.
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Dooley (Blalock) vs. Dooley
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Bobby Roberson vs. Martha Brasfield, Comm., et al
|
Lauderdale | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9707-CV-00152
|
Lake | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. David Joe Vineyard and Jimmy Lee Cockburn
Order on Petition To Rehear Upon consideration of the petition to rehear filed by the appellants Davey Joe Vineyard and Jimmy Lee Cockburn, this Court is of the opinion that the petition should be and the same is hereby denied. |
Bradley | Court of Appeals | |
Joseph Nolen v. Amy Nolen
|
Hickman | Court of Appeals | |
West vs. Dept. of Correction, et. al.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Carson vs. Agri-Products Special Markets
|
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
Sherrell vs. Sherrell
|
Lawrence | Court of Appeals | |
Sanders, et. ux. vs. Mansfield, et. al.
|
Lincoln | Court of Appeals | |
Culp vs. J.B. Hinson & Pevahouse
|
Wayne | Court of Appeals | |
Child Support Svcs. vs. Russell
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Little, et. al. vs. Hogan, et. al.
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Karr vs. Gibson
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Hollis vs. Hollis
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Mildred Daniel vs. James Daniel
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Robert Martin vs. Union Planters
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
McGlothlin vs. Bristol
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Stephens vs. Revco
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Worley vs. State
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Knoll vs. Knoll
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Cheri Owens Tuncay v. Engin Halif Tuncay - Concurring
This is a divorce case. Plaintiff-appellant Cheri Owens Tuncay was granted a divorce on the ground of inappropriate marital conduct. Mrs. Tuncay appeals the trial court’s division of the marital debts as well as the court’s failure to award her alimony beyond $5,000 in attorney fees. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Donald Neil Pierce, v. Branda Ann Radford Pierce
This is a divorce case. On appeal, Brenda Pierce (wife) raises the issues of whether the tril court erred by refusing to grant her periodic alimony, by failing to grant her the divorce, and by failing to grant her discretionary costs and attorney's fees. We modify the judgment and affirm as modified. |
Roane | Court of Appeals | |
Larry Stephen Roseberry, v. Janis Roseberry
In this divorce action, the appellant (husband) appeals from the judgment of the trial court questioning the amount of child support he was ordered to pay, the division of marital property and alimony, including the amount, nature, and duration. The appellee (wife) seeks attorney fees for this appeal. No issue is presented relating to the granting of the divorce. We note that at the time of the trial, the husbanc had more than enough life insurance in force to satisfy this requirement.
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Joey Brown, as next friend and natural guardian of Mitchell W. Brown, v. Walmart Discount Cities
In this slip and fall case in which a child slipped on some ice cubes in the vestibule of a large department store, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff but attributed 70 % of the fault to the unknown person who placed or dropped the ice on the floor. Ruling on a post-trial motion, the trial judge held that the store’s fault was 100% because the plaintiff could not sue the unknown tortfeasor. On appeal, the defendant asserts that there is no evidence to support the verdict and that the trial judge erred in modifying the jury’s verdict with respect to the degree of fault. We find that there is evidence from which the jury could have found that the store was negligent and that the store cannot attribute part of the fault to the unknown tortfeasor. We, therefore, affirm the lower court’s judgment. |
Lawrence | Court of Appeals |