State of Tennessee v. Corderro Mortez Lee
The Defendant, Corderro Mortez Lee, was convicted in the Gibson County Circuit Court of assault, a Class A misdemeanor, and received a sentence of eleven months, twenty-nine days to be served as four monthsin jail and the remainder on supervised probation. On appeal, he claims that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction and that his four-month jail sentenceis excessive. Based upon our review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Gibson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Quaverre Rogers
The Defendant, Quaverre Rogers, was convicted in the Shelby County Criminal Court of |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Sheppard Washington
In 2019, the Defendant, Sheppard Washington, pleaded guilty to two counts of violating |
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Toni Lynn Petersen
This matter is before the Court upon motion of the Defendant, Toni Lynn Petersen, for review of the trial court’s order granting the State’s motion to revoke her pretrial bond. See Tenn. R. App. P. 8; Tenn. Code. Ann. § 40-11-144. The State opposes. For the reasons stated below, the Defendant’s motion is denied. |
Rutherford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Eric Branch
Defendant, Eric Branch, appeals from his jury convictions for four counts of aggravated sexual battery, two counts of rape of a child, and one count of possession of a firearm by a person convicted of a felony crime of violence, for which he is serving an effective sentence of eighty-two years. On appeal, he argues that (1) his right to a unanimous verdict was violated in Counts 1 and 2; (2) the evidence is insufficient to support his convictions in Counts 3 and 4; and (3) the trial court erred by imposing an excessive sentence. After a thorough review of the record and applicable law, we affirm. |
Rutherford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Marcus Wade
Defendant, Marcus Wade, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court for Dickson County revoking his probation and ordering execution of his original ten‑year sentence. He argues that the trial court erred by considering hearsay evidence obtained from the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles website to find that he absconded from probation supervision. Following a review of the entire record, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Dickson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Spencer Baucom, Jr.
The Defendant, Spencer Baucom, Jr., sought an interlocutory appeal under Tennessee Rule of Appellate Procedure 9 and asked this court to review the trial court’s order denying him access to the audio recordings created by the court reporter during his rape trial. This court granted the Rule 9 application to address three questions. After a thorough review of the record, we reverse the trial court’s order in part and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. |
Rutherford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Nathaniel R. White-Young
On July 2, 2026, the pro se Petitioner filed a Petition for Post-Conviction Relief in |
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Gary Sutton v. State of Tennessee
The capital Petitioner, Gary Sutton, has filed an application for interlocutory appeal, see |
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Bernard Allen Wilson
In 2022, the Defendant, Bernard Allen Wilson, pleaded guilty to possession with the intent |
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Webster Malone v. Stanley Lovett, Warden
Petitioner, Webster Malone, appeals the summary dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus relief. Pursuant to Rule 20 of the Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals, we affirm. |
Rutherford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Terrence DeWayne Lewis, Jr.
Defendant, Terrence Dewayne Lewis, Jr., was convicted of two counts of first degree felony murder, and one count each of especially aggravated robbery, aggravated burglary, and second degree murder. The trial court ordered all sentences to run concurrently for an effective life sentence. On appeal, Defendant argues: (1) the trial court erred by admitting expert testimony; (2) the trial court erred by admitting the DNA testing of the swab from Defendant’s shoe; (3) the State committed prosecutorial misconduct in its closing argument; (4) the State violated Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), by failing to timely disclose discovery materials; (5) the trial court erred by admitting the video recording of the high speed police pursuit and other evidence at trial; (6) the trial court erred by limiting the cross-examination of Detective James Goehring; and (7) that cumulative error entitles him to a new trial. Following a review of the entire record, the briefs of the parties, the arguments of counsel, and the applicable law, we affirm the judgments of the trial court. |
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Charles Raymond Locke, Jr.
A Knox County jury convicted the Defendant, Charles Raymond Locke, Jr., of second |
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Roddarrius Eugene Jenkins
Roddarrius Eugene Jenkins, the Defendant, was convicted of first degree felony murder, especially aggravated robbery, a Class A felony, and being a felon in possession of a firearm, a Class B felony, by a Davidson County Criminal Court jury. See T.C.A § 39-13-202 (2018) (subsequently amended) (first degree murder); § 39-13-403 (2025) (especially aggravated robbery); § 39-17-1307 (2018) (subsequently amended) (felon in possession of a firearm). On appeal, the Defendant contends that the trial court erred by (1) violating his Equal Protection rights by denying his motion to appoint a second attorney, (2) denying his motions to suppress his pretrial statements, (3) admitting the Defendant’s uncorroborated statements as evidence, (4) denying, at the close of the State’s proof, the Defendant’s request for a self-defense instruction, (5) restricting the scope of the codefendant’s cross-examination, and (6) finding enhancement factors applied to the Defendant’s sentence. The Defendant also contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the Defendant’s convictions for felony murder and especially aggravated robbery. We affirm the judgments of the trial court. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Bryiant C. Overton v. State of Tennessee
Petitioner, Bryiant C. Overton, appeals the denial of his petition for writ of error coram nobis. He contends that the circuit court abused its discretion by re-characterizing his petition as one for coram nobis relief, by dismissing the petition as time-barred, and by treating prior post-conviction proceedings as a procedural bar. Upon review, we affirm. |
Rutherford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. John Skidmore, III
Defendant, John Skidmore, III, pleaded guilty to fourth offense driving under the influence (“DUI”) and was sentenced to two years suspended to probation after serving 150 days incarcerated. Following a hearing on a probation violation warrant, the trial court partially revoked Defendant’s probation, ordered him to serve one year and six months at 100 percent, and extended his probation for an additional year. Upon Defendant’s filing a motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.1, the trial court amended its prior revocation order and fully revoked Defendant’s probation. Defendant appeals and argues the trial court failed to place adequate findings on the record to justify its imposition of consequences for Defendant’s probation violation. After review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Benton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Michael Wayne Norton
A Knox County jury convicted the Defendant, Michael Wayne Norton, of aggravated |
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Javarius Deshawn Baugh v. State of Tennessee
A Davidson County jury convicted Petitioner, Javarius Deshawn Baugh, of first degree premeditated murder and unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, for which he received an effective life sentence. Petitioner now appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief, arguing that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Following our review, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Joseph Eugene Chestnut, Jr.
The Defendant, Joseph Eugene Chestnut, Jr., was convicted by a Macon County jury of one count of first degree premeditated murder and four counts of aggravated cruelty to animals. The trial court imposed an effective sentence of life imprisonment. On appeal, the Defendant claims that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress the firearm seized during the warrantless search of his vehicle and that the evidence of premeditation is insufficient to support his conviction of first degree murder. Following our review and pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 36, we remand for entry of a corrected judgment in Count One to correct a clerical error. Otherwise, we affirm the judgments of the trial court. |
Macon | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Brian Phillips
This single appeal asks this Court to review the trial court’s sentencing and |
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Travis Cohens
The Defendant, Travis Cohens, was convicted by a Shelby County Criminal Court jury of first degree premeditated murder, attempted second degree murder, reckless endangerment, two counts of employing a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony, and convicted felon in possession of a handgun. He raises four issues on appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred in admitting evidence of his prior bad acts; (2) whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain his first degree premeditated murder conviction; (3) whether the trial court erred by failing to give a complete and accurate jury instruction as to the knowing and intentional mens rea; and (4) whether the prosecutor engaged in prosecutorial misconduct by misstating the mens rea to the jury during closing argument. We affirm the judgments of the trial court. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Sarah Elaine Smith
The Defendant, Sarah Elaine Smith, pled guilty to two counts of attempted aggravated assault and one count each of reckless endangerment with a deadly weapon, leaving the scene of an accident involving personal injury or death, leaving the scene of an accident involving property damage in excess of $1,500, reckless driving, failure to exercise due care, and failure to maintain lane, for which the trial court imposed an effective sentence of one year of supervised probation. Following a restitution hearing, the trial court ordered the Defendant to pay $16,250 in restitution in installments of $200 per month. The Defendant appeals, arguing that the restitution award is unreasonable, that she will be unable to pay the full amount of the restitution award by the end of her probationary sentence under her current payment schedule, and that the trial court erred by failing to consider her financial resources and ability to pay the restitution award. Following our review, we reverse the trial court’s restitution order and remand for entry of a revised restitution order. |
Henderson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Annesha Jackson v. State of Tennessee
We conclude that the notice of appeal, filed pro se while represented by counsel, |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. John Jay Starnes
John Jay Starnes, Defendant, was convicted following a bench trial of two counts of unlawfully and negligently placing a child in imminent danger in violation of Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-15-401(d)(2022). Defendant argues that the trial court erred by denying diversion and by imposing a split-confinement sentence of eleven months and twenty-nine days, suspended to probation after service of thirty days in jail. Following a thorough review of the record and applicable law, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Montgomery | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Travarius Dewayne Houston
After a bench trial, the trial court convicted the Defendant, Trevarius Dewayne Houston, of two counts of assault against a law enforcement officer, one count of retaliation for past action, one count of theft of merchandise, and one count of resisting arrest. The trial court sentenced the Defendant to serve a total effective sentence of two years, suspended to a year of probation. On appeal, the Defendant asserts that: (1) the evidence is insufficient to support his convictions; and (2) the State committed prosecutorial misconduct during closing argument. After review, we reverse the trial court’s judgments in Count 1 and Count 3 and affirm the remaining judgments. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals |